The use of Confidential Informants has always been fraught with peril. In fact, a May 14, 2016 article by Jordan Smith of “The Intercept” describes how 89 of the 923 “Official Misconduct” exoneration’s since 1989 can be directly tied to the use of jailhouse informants. During this presentation, Jon Eliason, Division Chief of the Special Victims Division at the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, will discuss the ethics and pitfalls of using Confidential Informants. He will describe the critical role informants often play in developing a case, identify potential hazards in informant testimony, and navigate the case law governing CIs.
How Confidential Informant Testimony Could Result in Reversal

How Confidential Informant Testimony Could Result in Reversal
Duration: 75 Minutes
Module 1 | Resources |
---|---|
Recorded November 14, 2016 | |
Unit 1 | CI Slide Deck |
Unit 2 | CI Video |
Additional Resources


5 years ago
Giglio, Brady and Discipline Disclosures: An Interview with Rick Hodsdon
What is the Brady case and what does it have to do with you as a law enforcement officer or prosecut […]
6 years ago
Confidential Informant Courtroom Lessons Learned
Using confidential informants has always been a challenge. While there are times when using a CI is […]
6 years ago
Confidential Informants: Courtroom Lessons Learned – An Interview with Jon Eliason
Using confidential informants can be fraught with challenges. Between guidelines and case law, prose […]
7 years ago